tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3772414331480635861.post2448697135521773033..comments2024-03-18T18:19:19.002-07:00Comments on bylogos: Reviewing Intelligent Designjohn bylhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05766117392831032432noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3772414331480635861.post-30602270286948869202010-10-09T04:24:34.075-07:002010-10-09T04:24:34.075-07:00Here's the problem (well, one of many). The ID...Here's the problem (well, one of many). The ID proponents now tell us that they are NOT making a case for anything supernatural, they only wish to argue that what we see around us MUST have had a designer. <br /><br />There is a logic problem with that however. Let's assume that we find a designer for the things we see, some alien race from another planet. Well, the next logical question is, who created them? Surely they had to have had a creator too. Then who created the designer's designer and so on. Eventually you are left with one of two possibilities... <br /><br />1. There is a supernatural creator of the first race of creators OR <br /><br />2. The original creators evolved naturally. <br /><br />But if #2 is correct then why couldn't OUR world have evolved naturally? If #1 is correct then they ARE indeed arguing for the supernatural which is outside the realm of science.<br /><br />Can't have your cake and eat it too guys!Karlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06603794068803432957noreply@blogger.com